Retro-commissioning that does the investigation for you.
PEAK is the Full Loop Building Operations System for commissioning firms. It connects to your client's existing BMS, surfaces the faults an investigation would take weeks to find, and drives every one through to verified action - because your engineers' judgement is what the client is paying for. Everything else is overhead.
Retro-commissioning (RCx) is a systematic process for returning an existing building's systems to the performance they were designed to deliver - finding the faults, fixing them, and verifying the result.
CIM PEAK is retro-commissioning software that runs the full loop: fault detection and diagnostics to find the issues, workflow to close them, and continuous monitoring to verify the savings hold.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, analysis of more than 60,000 pieces of HVAC equipment. In an RCx engagement, finding them by hand is what consumes the margin.
The hardest part of RCx isn't the fixing. It's the finding.
A typical engagement spends most of its budget on investigation - pulling trend logs, chasing point names, walking plant and reverse-engineering what the BMS has been quietly doing wrong for years.
Finding is step one.
Investigate in days rather than weeks, implement with evidence rather than opinion, and verify that every fix actually landed. The difference between "we recommended 31 actions" and "we resolved 31 actions".
Investigate
PEAK connects read-only to the client's existing BMS and returns a ranked, diagnosed fault list with probable cause and cost - before your engineers walk the plant.
Recommend
The AI recommends; your engineers decide. Every recommendation carries the client's own trend data as evidence, so scope discussions rest on their data rather than judgement calls they can push back on.
Implement
Findings become actions your team owns - assigned, escalated and closed out, with every fix attributed and on the record. The client relationship stays with your firm.
Verify
PEAK confirms each fault cleared and stays cleared after handover, and catches the drift that quietly erases retro-commissioning savings.
RCx, MBCx and ongoing commissioning.
The three models differ in one respect above all: how long the monitoring stays on after the engagement ends. That decides whether the savings last - and whether the work recurs.
Monitoring stays on after handover, so drift is caught before it erodes the result.
The RCx project becomes an ongoing service with the same client.
The same team covers five times the sites.
Each resolved fault is verified and attributed to your team.
What it looks like when the loop closes



How FDD unlocks growth for engineering consultancies
For firms turning commissioning projects into a recurring service line on top of fault detection and diagnostics.
- Where FDD creates new billable work
- How to cover more sites without more engineers
- How to prove the value back to clients
Built for firms that deliver commissioning
Deliver more engagements, at higher margin, with outcomes you can prove - one system across the whole engagement and every client you run it for.
Cross-vendor from day one
One fault list across Siemens, Schneider, Honeywell, Trend and mixed legacy estates. No controller replacement, no per-site rebuild.
Multi-client visibility
Portfolio views per client, engagement-level fault tracking, and reporting clients can take to their own stakeholders.
Prioritised by impact, not noise
Faults ranked by energy cost, comfort impact and equipment risk, so scope is grounded in the client's own data.
Read-only, no control risk
PEAK reads data the BMS already holds. Old systems usually mean more findings, not a reason to wait.
The project is the entry point. The retainer is the business.
Retro-commissioning has a built-in expiry date: performance drifts the day the engagement ends. That is bad for the building - and worse for your revenue model, because it makes RCx a procurement event instead of a relationship.
Savings decay after handover
The engagement delivers real savings - then performance drifts the day the monitoring stops, and the value quietly erodes until the next procurement cycle.
The project becomes the on-ramp
PEAK stays connected after handover: continuous fault detection, a review cadence you own, and verified savings your client can report year after year. Your firm moves from selling investigations to operating a service.
The firm that turned commissioning projects into a platform business
Aero Performance Group, a division of the Hill Group, has been a leading RCx and MBCx provider in the ComEd utility program since it began - saving clients more than $26.5M in energy costs. Before PEAK, its engineers reviewed BMS data manually.
Aero Performance Group · ChicagoThe platform's real-time monitoring, powerful FDD, client-friendly dashboards, and exceptional support from the CIM team have helped us to scale quickly, improve client engagement, and maintain a high standard of operational excellence across our growing portfolio.
Works with your client's existing BMS
PEAK is BMS-agnostic, so an RCx project does not wait on a controls upgrade. It reads the systems below through BACnet/IP, routed BACnet MS/TP, a vendor API or scheduled CSV exports - read-only, with no rip-and-replace of the existing controls.
Retro-commissioning, explained
Does PEAK replace the RCx engineer?+
No. PEAK does the data work - detection, diagnosis, prioritisation and verification. The AI recommends; your engineers decide. The engineering judgement, client relationship and implementation remain yours. Firms use it to redeploy engineering hours from investigation to resolution.
Does it work on old or mixed-vendor BMS estates?+
Yes - that is the normal case, not the exception. Serial networks are bridged with a router, closed systems are reached through a gateway or vendor interface, and read-only access means no control-system risk. An old BMS usually means more findings, not fewer.
How fast is a building connected?+
Typically two to eight weeks from data access to a meaningful first fault list, depending on BMS accessibility and point naming quality. Subsequent buildings in a portfolio connect faster.
What is the difference between RCx and monitoring-based commissioning?+
Retro-commissioning is the point-in-time engagement; monitoring-based commissioning is what it becomes when the monitoring stays on. PEAK supports both - most partners start with an RCx project and transition the client to a continuous service.
Powering property teams in these world leading companies.

